Actueel
alle pijlers
Vliegtuig uit Amsterdam neergestort in Rusland
donderdag 17 juli 2014 om 18:05
quote:LadyPhoxy schreef op 17 juli 2014 @ 18:01:
Oh nee....mijn beste vriendin zou vandaag naar Kuala Lumpur vliegen...maar er gaan vast meerdere vluchten per dag...toch?Ik duim voor je dat ze de andere vlucht heeft...
Oh nee....mijn beste vriendin zou vandaag naar Kuala Lumpur vliegen...maar er gaan vast meerdere vluchten per dag...toch?Ik duim voor je dat ze de andere vlucht heeft...
De term: "help" in caps-lock als topic-titel is over het algemeen omgekeerd evenredig aan de ernst van het betreffende probleem.
donderdag 17 juli 2014 om 18:06
donderdag 17 juli 2014 om 18:08
quote:Scamp schreef op 17 juli 2014 @ 18:05:
[...]
Dat was op het Brits nieuws dat MA onkent iets te weten over een vliegtuig.Daarmee maken ze zich nog minder populair. Tis al erg genoeg dat ze 2 volle vluchten binnen 'n paar maanden zijn verloren, maar dat ze nabestaanden aan 't lijntje houden, is echt de limit.
[...]
Dat was op het Brits nieuws dat MA onkent iets te weten over een vliegtuig.Daarmee maken ze zich nog minder populair. Tis al erg genoeg dat ze 2 volle vluchten binnen 'n paar maanden zijn verloren, maar dat ze nabestaanden aan 't lijntje houden, is echt de limit.
donderdag 17 juli 2014 om 18:11
Analysis: Jonathan Beale, BBC News
A defence expert has told the BBC that shooting down a plane at 10,000m (9.7 miles) would have required a long- range surface-to-air missile - possibly guided by radar.
That suggests it is unlikely it could have been downed by a portable air defence missile, or Manpad, which has a much shorter range.
The only other possibility is for an aircraft at that height to be downed by a fighter carrying air-to-air missiles.
The US will have access to satellite imagery that should be able to identify ultra-violet plumes if a long-range surface-to-air missile was fired.
line
A number of Ukrainian military planes have been shot down by missiles in recent weeks. Ukraine has accused Russia's military of supplying advanced missiles to the rebels.
Earlier on Thursday, Ukrainian officials blamed the Russian air force for shooting down one of its ground attack jets on Wednesday.
Anton Herashchenko, an adviser to Ukraine's interior minister, was quoted by the Associated Press as saying the plane had been hit by a missile at an altitude of 10,000m (33,000ft). The claim could not be verified independently.
The source which spoke to Reuters about burning wreckage on the ground said the plane had failed to enter Russian airspace.
The UK Foreign Office said it was aware of the reports of the crash and was "urgently working to establish what has happened".
A defence expert has told the BBC that shooting down a plane at 10,000m (9.7 miles) would have required a long- range surface-to-air missile - possibly guided by radar.
That suggests it is unlikely it could have been downed by a portable air defence missile, or Manpad, which has a much shorter range.
The only other possibility is for an aircraft at that height to be downed by a fighter carrying air-to-air missiles.
The US will have access to satellite imagery that should be able to identify ultra-violet plumes if a long-range surface-to-air missile was fired.
line
A number of Ukrainian military planes have been shot down by missiles in recent weeks. Ukraine has accused Russia's military of supplying advanced missiles to the rebels.
Earlier on Thursday, Ukrainian officials blamed the Russian air force for shooting down one of its ground attack jets on Wednesday.
Anton Herashchenko, an adviser to Ukraine's interior minister, was quoted by the Associated Press as saying the plane had been hit by a missile at an altitude of 10,000m (33,000ft). The claim could not be verified independently.
The source which spoke to Reuters about burning wreckage on the ground said the plane had failed to enter Russian airspace.
The UK Foreign Office said it was aware of the reports of the crash and was "urgently working to establish what has happened".
donderdag 17 juli 2014 om 18:13
quote:Star schreef op 17 juli 2014 @ 18:05:
18u01 Pro-Russische seperatisten claimen neerhalen vliegtuig
is nog niet bevestigd toch?
ik vertrouw er sowieso niemand...beide partijen bevatten mensen die zelfs niet schuwen voor met opzet een vliegtuig neer halen om VS en EU te laten in grijpen/embargo Rusland op laten heffen..
18u01 Pro-Russische seperatisten claimen neerhalen vliegtuig
is nog niet bevestigd toch?
ik vertrouw er sowieso niemand...beide partijen bevatten mensen die zelfs niet schuwen voor met opzet een vliegtuig neer halen om VS en EU te laten in grijpen/embargo Rusland op laten heffen..
